Save the C&O Canal from intrusive development!
DEFENDERS OF POTOMAC RIVER PARKLAND
Environmental Assessment
This page concerns the Environmental Assessment (EA) process pursued by the National Park Service before switching to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process.ANNOUNCEMENT: EA Scoping Meeting, January 11, 2005
TEXT of the draft Environmental Assessment, April 2006
COMMENTS:
Congressional:
Roscoe Bartlett
Tom Davis
Chris Van Hollen
Organizational:
Sheila Weidenfeld - Final Letter to Secretary Kempthorne
Alma Gates - Advisory Neighborhood Commission 3D
Mark Bjorge - Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner, District 2B05
Neal Fitzpatrick - Audubon Naturalist Society
Dolores Milmoe - Audubon Naturalist Society
Celina Montorfano - American Hiking Society
Courtney Caldwell - Canoe Cruisers Association
Fred Mopsik - Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Association
Ernie Brooks - Coalition for the Capital Crescent Trail
Sally Strain - Defenders of Potomac River Parkland
George Clark - Federation of Citizens Associations of the District of Columbia
Tim Dennee - Government of the District of Columbia Historic Preservation Office
Grace Malakoff - League of Women Voters
Robert Flanagan - Maryland Department of Transportation
Jeffrey Komarow - Montgomery Sycamore Island Club
Joy Oakes - National Parks Conservation Association
Elizabeth Merritt - National Trust for Historic Preservation
Matthew Logan - Potomac Conservancy
Jason Broehm - Sierra Club
Don Hawkins - The Committee of 100 on the Federal City
Larry Schuette - Washington Canoe Club
Janine Blaeloch - Western Lands Project
Individual:
Pope Barrow - Hydrological Impacts
Amber Jones - Comments on Georgetown University Boathouse EA
Carl Linden - The Indefensible Premise of the EA
Robert Norris - Comments on the Environmental Assessment
Robert Norris - Comments on the Land Exchange
John Wheeler - Draft EA is Woefully Deficient
David Winer - Boathouse construction could cause flooding, erosion